Accuracy of Widebands
so when I changed over the 1.6 to the 1.8 my Wideband crapped it about the same time.
So got a new one.
but the new one seems so much more accurate than the old one. In hind sight... I feel the old one was never really accurate & made the whole tune run very rich. fuel consuption was massive.
I'm using a Bosh 4.9 with a Innovative LC 2 controller unit
Accuracy of Wideband
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
Accuracy of Wideband
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
- greenMachine
- Forum Guru
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Sports car paradise - Canberra
- Contact:
Re: Accuracy of Wideband
Mine comes in different grades - I have an AFR500v2 with an NTK calibration grade sensor. It was pretty exxy, even at the then-prevailing USD exchange rate, but my tuner reckoned it was good insurance. That was the mid-grade NTK sensor (production, calibration, lab), the lab grade would have way more than doubled the base price with the LSU 4.9, an extra US$450
What was the one that died on you?
Running rich should have been dialled out on the dyno, using the dyno's sensor to calibrate it. Did you have someone check the tune on the dyno? On the other hand, maybe the sensor was dying over a period and just pushing it progressively richer until it finally curled up its toes ... .
What was the one that died on you?
Running rich should have been dialled out on the dyno, using the dyno's sensor to calibrate it. Did you have someone check the tune on the dyno? On the other hand, maybe the sensor was dying over a period and just pushing it progressively richer until it finally curled up its toes ... .
I never met a horsepower I didn't like (thanks bwob)
Build thread
NB SE - gone to the dark side (and loving it )
Build thread
NB SE - gone to the dark side (and loving it )
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
Re: Accuracy of Wideband
never had anyone check the tune on the dyno.
the one that died was also a bosh 4.9
I will get this engine on the dyno once i have the big cams in.
the one that died was also a bosh 4.9
I will get this engine on the dyno once i have the big cams in.
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:33 pm
- Vehicle: NA8 - Supercharged
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Accuracy of Wideband
My 4.9 died at a very young age, I replaced it and no trouble since. I suspect what killed it was having it heated before an engine start, apparently condensation from a cold engine start can thermal shock the heated sensor. I used to have ignition on to fiddle with ecu settings. Now I just immediately start the car. A more elaborate solution would to be use an output from the ECU such as RPM>400 to drive a relay which then supplies power to the Wideband O2 sensor. More wires!
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: Accuracy of Wideband
Red_Bullet wrote:My 4.9 died at a very young age, I replaced it and no trouble since. I suspect what killed it was having it heated before an engine start, apparently condensation from a cold engine start can thermal shock the heated sensor. I used to have ignition on to fiddle with ecu settings. Now I just immediately start the car. A more elaborate solution would to be use an output from the ECU such as RPM>400 to drive a relay which then supplies power to the Wideband O2 sensor. More wires!
Mine's just wired to a switch.
If I want it off, I just flip that and no concerns.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:33 pm
- Vehicle: NA8 - Supercharged
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Accuracy of Wideband
hks_kansei wrote:Red_Bullet wrote:My 4.9 died at a very young age, I replaced it and no trouble since. I suspect what killed it was having it heated before an engine start, apparently condensation from a cold engine start can thermal shock the heated sensor. I used to have ignition on to fiddle with ecu settings. Now I just immediately start the car. A more elaborate solution would to be use an output from the ECU such as RPM>400 to drive a relay which then supplies power to the Wideband O2 sensor. More wires!
Mine's just wired to a switch.
If I want it off, I just flip that and no concerns.
Did I read somewhere that not being heated and then exposed to the exhaust stream that they get damaged by contaminants, it's not something I've looked at for a few years now.
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: Accuracy of Wideband
Red_Bullet wrote:Did I read somewhere that not being heated and then exposed to the exhaust stream that they get damaged by contaminants, it's not something I've looked at for a few years now.
I think it's something to do with them getting clagged up with carbon and stuff, where the heat helps stop it from sticking.
or something like that.
But yeah, mine's always on anyway, the only time I switch it off is if i'm in the car listening to the radio without the engine running (mine powers with acc, rather than ign, since I couldnt be bothered finding a switched ign source when I installed it)
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
Return to “MX5 Audio, Electronics & Lighting”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests