Motor - 2008 tyre test

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

rjastra2
Racing Driver
Posts: 1435
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 10:15 pm

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby rjastra2 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:44 am

FYI

Motor have released their 2008 tyre test - sized = 215/45x17 on a Clio 197.
This year they test road tyres (eg Adrenalin) as well as semi slicks (e g R888) and a dedicated slick (dunlop formula r)

Some interesting results.

stevesports
Racing Driver
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:02 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby stevesports » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:34 am

What are the results?

User avatar
mx52nv
Purple Porsche Eater
Posts: 1345
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:13 am
Vehicle: Non MX-5
Location: Perth

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby mx52nv » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:35 am

rjastra2 wrote:FYI

Motor have released their 2008 tyre test - sized = 215/45x17 on a Clio 197.
This year they test road tyres (eg Adrenalin) as well as semi slicks (e g R888) and a dedicated slick (dunlop formula r)

Some interesting results.

Hey rjastra2,
Was there supposed to be a link somewhere there?
Or was it just a heads up to go read/buy the magazine?

stevesports
Racing Driver
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:02 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby stevesports » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:41 am

nevermind, i found the results. SS = semi-slick

est 1 - Dry Slalom
1. Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE001 13.1s
2. Dunlop Sp Sport Maxx 13.2s
3. Maxxis Victra i-pro 13.3s
4. Pirelli P Zero Nero 13.3s
5. Federal 595 Evo 13.4s
6. Hankook Ventus V12 Evo 13.4s
7. Continental Sportcontact 3 13.5s
8. Goodyear Eagle F1 13.6s

Semi-slicks
1. Bridgestone Potenza RE55 12.8s
2. Toyo Proxes R888 12.8s
3. Dunlop Direzza 03G 13.0s
4. Federal 595 RSR 13.3s

Test 2 - Wet Slalom
1. B'stone Potenza 13.2s
2. Dunlop SP 13.5s
=3. Continental Sport 3 13.6s
=3. Goodyear F1 13.6s

S/S
1. Toyo Proxes 13.8s
2. B'stone Potenza 14.1s
3. Dunlop Direzza 14.2s

Test 3 - Dry Braking
1. B'stone Potenza 36.7m
2. Maxxis Victra 38.1m
3. Goodyear F1 38.3m

S/S
1. Dunlop 34.2m
2. B'stone 34.4m
3. Toyo 34.7m

Test 4 - Wet Braking
1. Goodyear F1 38.1m
2. Dunlop SP 39.4m
3. Pirelli 39.5m

S/S
1. Federal 39.4
2. Dunlop 39.6m
3. Toyo 39.6m

Test 5 - Lateral G Dry
1. Maxxis 1.01g
=2 Pirelli 1.00g
= Hankook
= Federal
=B'stone

S/S
1. Dunlop 1.08g
2. B'stone 1.07g
=3. Toyo 1.04g
=Federal

Test 6 - Lateral G Wet
1. Goodyear 1.04g
=2. Hankook 0.96g
= Dunlop
= Contiental

S/S
1. Dunlop 1.02g
2. B'stone 0.98g
=3. Toyo 0.96g
= Federal

Test 7 - Lap times
=1. Federal 39.9s
=. Hankook 39.9s
3. Goodyear 40.0s

S/S
1. B'stone 39.1s
2. Dunlop 39.1s
3. Federal 39.4

Test 8 - Apex Speeds
1. Pirelli 63.2kmh
2. Maxxis 63.1kmh
3. B'stone 62.4kmh

S/S
1. Dunlop 66.7kmh
2. Federal 66.2kmh
3. B'stone 65.3kmh

Overall scores
1. B'stone
2. Maxxis
3. Goodyear

S/S
1. Dunlop
2. B'stone
3. Toyo

Overall road tyre winner Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE001, closely followed by the Maxxis Victra i-pro. Overall semislick winner was Dunlop by some margin.

User avatar
mx52nv
Purple Porsche Eater
Posts: 1345
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:13 am
Vehicle: Non MX-5
Location: Perth

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby mx52nv » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:48 am

Wow :shock: long post there stevesports :mrgreen: But thanks!
So Bridgestone Adrenalins (street tyres) and Dunlop 03s (semi-slicks) FTW eh?

User avatar
16bit
Speed Racer
Posts: 2346
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:51 pm
Vehicle: NB8A - Supercharged
Location: Brisbane Southside

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby 16bit » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:56 am

almost had the perfect combo bridgestone reoo1 with dunlop do1's.

definitly getting the do3's now.
98 evo gold - rotrexed and loving it.

This post has been printed using recycled pixels

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7708
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby bruce » Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:11 am

wow. I can't type that many words.

wow again. A Maxxis tyre came second? I thought they were just a cheap and nasty China tyre.

User avatar
bensale
Racing Driver
Posts: 1984
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:38 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby bensale » Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:19 am

Thanks for that. Maxis hey? I may have a look into them, i need some new tyres in the next couple of months. I image they are a fair bit cheaper than the re001's too.
www.othersideproductions.com
NA6-Phillip Island 1:57.7, Winton 1:42.9, Winton Short 1:12.4, Sandown 1:35.2, Wakefield 1.15.9, Nurburgring 9:17.0

rjastra2
Racing Driver
Posts: 1435
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 10:15 pm

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby rjastra2 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:32 am

The adrenalins did well except for wet braking (a worry) and track times (blitzed by most other tyres).

User avatar
GS
Fast Driver
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 6:40 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Sydney

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby GS » Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:17 pm

Interesting. Wonder if the Adrenalins were manufactured in Australia or Japan? According to the Bridgestone website, that size should be made in Australia. If so, is goes against the theory that the Aust made ones are rubbish.
Image
1989 NA6

User avatar
Okibi
Speed Racer
Posts: 10901
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby Okibi » Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:11 pm

How scientific were the tests? Even the best driver would have variations in their own time through a slalom. Did they do multiple runs at different tyre pressures? Or did they stick to the same psi for each as per the vehicle manufacturers specs? Or did they stick to the psi recommended by the tyre manufacturer? How close were the tyre temperatures? Was the surface prepped before hand or did the first lot sweep the course and lay down rubber? I'm sure there's a load of variables.
If you had access to a car like this, would you take it back right away? Neither would I.

rjastra2
Racing Driver
Posts: 1435
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 10:15 pm

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby rjastra2 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:01 pm

Okibi wrote:How scientific were the tests? Even the best driver would have variations in their own time through a slalom. Did they do multiple runs at different tyre pressures? Or did they stick to the same psi for each as per the vehicle manufacturers specs? Or did they stick to the psi recommended by the tyre manufacturer? How close were the tyre temperatures? Was the surface prepped before hand or did the first lot sweep the course and lay down rubber? I'm sure there's a load of variables.


Read the article :)

Or did they stick to the psi recommended by the tyre manufacturer?


What's that exactly? Tyre inflation figures are suggested by the car manufacturer.

CJ5

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby CJ5 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:07 pm

rjastra2 wrote:What's that exactly? Tyre inflation figures are suggested by the car manufacturer.


car manufacturers' figures would more likely be geared towards ride comfort for most cars, whereas if you give the TYRE manufacturer a call they will recommend something geared more towards tyre life/performance

wun911
Speed Racer
Posts: 2114
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:13 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby wun911 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:19 pm

I am also not sure I would chose based on that article alone...
every ounce counts

CJ5

Motor - 2008 tyre test

Postby CJ5 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:03 pm

wun911 wrote:I am also not sure I would chose based on that article alone...


yer, u know something's gotta be screwy when Maxxis tyres came in number1 for non SS in the lateral G test


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 181 guests