Ah, yeah that's fairly low.
As for the Ford being cheaper, EB was still live axle if I remember correctly.
Live axle has pretty much no adjustment, so they wouldn't have needed (or been able) to align the rear.
Good Victorian alignment places
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: Good Victorian alignment places
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 11857
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Good Victorian alignment places
username wrote:And $35-45 is what Ive paid for my Ford EB as what my families paid for their cars
hks_kansei wrote:As for the Ford being cheaper, EB was still live axle if I remember correctly.
Live axle has pretty much no adjustment, so they wouldn't have needed (or been able) to align the rear.
Yeah, 2 wheel alignment v 4 wheel alignment, hence the price diff with the MX5.
-
- Driver
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:37 am
- Vehicle: Clubman
Re: Good Victorian alignment places
Some pretty average angles you've got according to those readings. Keep a good eye on your inside tyre wear.
Lots of KPI + lots of castor usually means lots of neg camber on turns.
Lots of KPI + lots of castor usually means lots of neg camber on turns.
Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 143 guests