Hi guys, I am new here and I would really appreciate the advice
I am looking for a used MX-5 and I have come across these two adverts.
Is there a big difference in the auto gearbox between these two models that I should go for the 1997 (british racing green) version? Things such as performance, comfort and road noise
The reason why I like the 1990 (white) model more is the colour, the beige leather trim and overall looks really nice inside compared to the 1997 one I am looking at. Both have similar kilometers around 120,000km. But the 1990 one i cheaper by $3,500.
1990 Auto Vs 1997 Auto
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy
-
theaussieinhk
- Driver
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:21 am
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Sydney
1990 Auto Vs 1997 Auto
Sydney
2005 NC MX5
2005 NC MX5
-
rwf
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:36 pm
- Vehicle: NB Roadster
- Location: brisbane
Re: 1990 Auto Vs 1997 Auto
If u can afford the 1997
Get it
1800
More bracing
Stronger diff
Better brakes
Get it
1800
More bracing
Stronger diff
Better brakes
SOLD. MX-5 NA 2F RACE CAR -LAKESIDE 1:04.91 -QR Clubman 1:06.3608
SOLD. Mx-5 NC 2007
Mazda 3 sp25 2015
MX-5 NB
-
93_Clubman
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 11857
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Melbourne
Re: 1990 Auto Vs 1997 Auto
^+1
1.6 motor in auto na6 is also detuned, so apart from having to contend with the auto transmission it has less power than 1.6 manual motor.
1.6 motor in auto na6 is also detuned, so apart from having to contend with the auto transmission it has less power than 1.6 manual motor.
Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests
