Page 1 of 2
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:07 pm
by wun911
I belive its ~10 kg for the 1.6...
why do you ask?
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:24 pm
by RG.net
wun911 wrote:I belive its ~10 kg for the 1.6...
why do you ask?
the lighter the better?
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:13 pm
by wun911
I think the 1.8 is 15 mm wider and its about ~2-3k heavier. Larger heavier rotating mass holds more inertia, blah blah blah.
Interchangable between NA and NB they both take the same clutch alignment tool etc.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:28 pm
by matt9111
I'm pretty sure I read on a jap site the NB8B flywheel weighs 11kg minus the ring gear, im in the process (STILL) of getting a lightweight flywheel, 4kg including ring gear, and a exedy Button Clutch installed, just trying to get some cash together. Lol
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:12 pm
by Fatty
wun911 wrote:Interchangable between NA and NB they both take the same clutch alignment tool etc.
yep, but you need to change the clutch as well as the flywheel. some people run 1.6 clutch and fly on the 1.8 as it revs easier. and some turbo 1.6 guys run the 1.8 clutch and fly coz it's beefier and less prone to slip.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:56 pm
by d-mag
Speaking of flywheels, is a lightened flywheel on a Turbo 1.8 much of an advantage?
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:29 pm
by Fatty
2 schools of thought on that one. you might get on boost earlier with a lightened flywheel, but revs will drop quickly on gearshifts meaning you'll need to build boost again. whereas with a normal / heavy flywheel , the revs will stay higher during gearshift (more momentum) so you'll still be on boost when you select the next gear.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:50 pm
by d-mag
OK got it; Keep the same flywheel, just give it more boost.

FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:46 am
by wun911
I have heard LFW has very little influence on when boost comes one... correct me if im worng thogh.
1.8 Flywheel being slighly larger can hold more clamping force for less pedal effort, makes life easy.
Just because two flywheels are almost the same weight give take 1-2kg does not mean they both hold the same amout of inertia, it is more important to remove weight where it counts.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:48 am
by Matty
Wun, surprised you haven't gotten one of emilio's 7.25" flywheels yet...
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=303542
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 7:24 am
by CT
My turbo racer has an ACT Pro Race flywheel and it does nothing but help. Less rotating mass is always the goal for performance engines - turbo or na.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:48 am
by Fatty
yes , thats why i stuck with the 1.6 flywheel when i turbo'd my car, rather than go the heavier but stronger 1.8.
i was just offering the 2 schools of thought that had been put to me when i was making enquiries about which path to follow.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:10 pm
by Fabio
I've just replaced my flywheel on my NA6, and it weight 7.9Kg (with ring gear) on my bathroom scales, and the one I replaced it with is 4.1Kg. My clutch works well on the street, still very easy to drive, but it is noisier, especially when off the throttle at high revs. Not sure why, but I have heard that it is a common occurance with really light flywheels. If anyone can explain why, I'd like to know why they are noisy.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:32 pm
by wun911
At that weight its probably aluminum, aluminum flywheels are usually more noizy than stock (shaved down) or chromomoly.
FLYWHEEL WEIGHTS
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:04 am
by Fuzzlet
I have an NA8 flywheel sitting out in the shed. If I remember when I get home I'll pop it on the scales