I've managed to find some rod weights:
- 323 GTX: 580g
- Miata: 562g
- Crower: 543g
- Pauter: 493g
- Oliver: 465g
- Carrillo (A-beam): 416g
- Carrillo (H-beam): 440g
That varies a bit from the "40g heavier' that I had heard the B6T rods were when compared to a stock MX-5 rod. Then again, that list says "323 GTX" and not specifically B6T - so I'll have to do some more reading - that could even be the now-superceded BPT rod, or the rare Familia GTR rod. Apparently standard rods are good for 20psi (see below for the reference) - so if B6T rods are beefier, then they're going to be more than ample for my needs. An xray, shotpeen and polish should get them at the spec I want. I'm not increasing the rev limiter, so my choice of rod isn't as critical here while chasing power figures involving <20psi.
I believe I've quoted this before, but for everyone's benefit, here it is again (from the archives):
MX5_DriftFury wrote:Having tested B6 rods personally on a proper conrod axial loading equipment (at cyl pressures~20MPa), using MEASURED cylinder pressures, and measuring their cycle fatigue life, STD Miata rods are MORE than ample for 20lbs of boost, even at the standard comp ratio! If it's a boosted engine your building, you need to have ample BUCKLING STRENGTH (i-beam), to resist the high gas loads (compressive forces), whereas a high revving NatAsp engine requires relatively light but stiff rods (h-beam) rods, but with high beaming/bending strength, to resist the very high bending moments induced by the ineretia loads of high rpm operation. If you're not revving it much above stock, don't waste your money of $$$ rods...just use stockies. Carillos and the like are generally high-rpm rods, H BEAM, and offer not a large improvement in buckling strength over stock with big boost......they are VERY easy to buckle with high gas loads. Much better are 4340 billet H-Beam rods...we have used PAR rods from sydney, and they are AWESOME (and reasonably priced).....beuatifully & accurately machined....ask for Sam or Norrie and they can make with long rods more likely to buckle, they were perfect at 20lbs and beyond. They are used in WRX 2.0 litre engines with up 45lbs boost (and running 9secs!!). Cannot speak highly enough of their engineering prowess, and their helpful nature.
BPT (TX3) rods have been superceded by Miata rods, and have been for some time. Bolts are the same part. Bolts are the most important aspect of the rod for high revs...much more important than the rod design (except its more important to get a LIGHTER rod & PISTON for higher RPM...inertia loads go up with the CUBE of speed)...if you want to see great rods, pull down an M3 engine, virtually any Merc of recent times, and most particularly, 20V toyota (esp. black top AE111). S2000 is another i've seen with much more attention paid to redcuing mass rather than beefing it up. Boosted engines are the only ones that really can "bend" a rod...NatAsp engines at high rpm fail rods due to fatigue life of the beam/big end interface (tfatigue stress higher than endurance limit) or the bolts stretch (yield) and then its really all over!!
cont...