TURBO TIME ( NOW WITH 140.4 KW )

Engines, Transmissions & Final Drive questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel

User avatar
Woo
Fast Driver
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:43 am
Vehicle: 10AE - Turbo
Location: OES Melbourne
Contact:

Postby Woo » Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:41 pm

The turbo outlet is the source of the hot air.

As you know Sean, the harder the turbo works the higher the charge temp.

The IC effectively cools the charge making it more dense. This lowers the pressure \"seen\" on the outlet side of the IC.

Sure you always should measure the boost at the manifold (inlet) but to achieve the same sustained boost pressure with an IC will require the turbo to work harder.

This greater degree of work is translated directly as heat. Heat then has to be removed by the IC.

What I'm trying to explain is that an IC doesn't make air. It can only cool whats there. What I was originally saying was that if the air doesn't need to be cooled (ie. a single power run) there will be no loss of pressure so no decrease in charge volume.

PV=nRT and p=m/v explain it all.

Regards
Wòó
Very slightly modified 10AE #2562 ..... one of 149 in Australia :wink:
Race what you brung ..... And hope you brung enough

glen73
Fast Driver
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:08 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Dromana Vic.
Contact:

Re:

Postby glen73 » Sat Aug 05, 2006 9:12 pm

Woo wrote:The turbo outlet is the source of the hot air.

As you know Sean, the harder the turbo works the higher the charge temp.

The IC effectively cools the charge making it more dense. This lowers the pressure "seen" on the outlet side of the IC.

Sure you always should measure the boost at the manifold (inlet) but to achieve the same sustained boost pressure with an IC will require the turbo to work harder.

This greater degree of work is translated directly as heat. Heat then has to be removed by the IC.

What I'm trying to explain is that an IC doesn't make air. It can only cool whats there. What I was originally saying was that if the air doesn't need to be cooled (ie. a single power run) there will be no loss of pressure so no decrease in charge volume.

PV=nRT and p=m/v explain it all.

Regards
Wòó


i think you might want to look for or start a thread called intercooled Vs non-intercooled. your sort of hijacking russell's thread.

PS i hope your wearing your seat-belt when traveling at 3kmph :D :lol: :D :lol:

User avatar
Woo
Fast Driver
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:43 am
Vehicle: 10AE - Turbo
Location: OES Melbourne
Contact:

Re:

Postby Woo » Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:10 pm

glen73 wrote:from what i have read thats not a bad return without a IC. :)

glen73 wrote:your sort of hijacking russell's thread.


Ok I can see the logic there. :lol:
glen73 wrote:PS i hope your wearing your seat-belt when traveling at 3kmph :D :lol: :D :lol:

It's law in Vic to wear a seatbelt whilst travelling forward on a public road. So, yes, I am wearing my seatbelt when doing 3 kph. Unlike others that only travel backwards.

pffft

Wòó
Very slightly modified 10AE #2562 ..... one of 149 in Australia :wink:
Race what you brung ..... And hope you brung enough

glen73
Fast Driver
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:08 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Dromana Vic.
Contact:

Postby glen73 » Sun Aug 06, 2006 2:26 am

dude are you normal!
why you so sensitive about everything!
I'm trying to keep this debate above the belt but you keep dropping little bitchy-boy comments all the time. whats up with you! are you a keyboard warrior or something.
i don't even understand your last reply!
man give it a rest :roll:

User avatar
Russellb
RIP Nov 2014
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:22 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Harden NSW
Contact:

Postby Russellb » Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:17 am

Glen 2000km and the engine is not leaking a drop :shock: . That breather line you are talking about should be vented back to the turbo inlet ( just haven't got around to it )Like you i have been having too much fun driving :D
on the coments that WOO made an intercooler will always help to make power as the Air temp will be lower . JUST like SEAN said
Even on a single power run intake temps where getting near 70deg C
Glen I will Intercool at a later date but there are a lot of little things to move (the A/C line infront of the rad are a big prob)
WOO pull your head in and start your own thread :x
My ClubmanRebuild
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE :)

User avatar
Russellb
RIP Nov 2014
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:22 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Harden NSW
Contact:

Postby Russellb » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:30 pm

Well after 10 000km the Ebay turbo was leaking So much oil that I Changed it last friday. I Upgraded from the T25 to the T28 Highflowed.
Boost is up from 7psi to 10 psi and intake temps are about the same.
Got a chance to run it on a Dyno today :D

Image

And still with No FMIC :shock:
My ClubmanRebuild
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE :)

User avatar
Boags
Speed Racer
Posts: 3533
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:25 pm
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Brisvegas
Contact:

Postby Boags » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:58 pm

That is very nice power! 8)

And I have to say... *flame suit on* - I agree with Woo re single power run figures without intercooler will be higher.

But that is a different topic! Great work Russellb!!

Boags
Spartan Motor Sport : http://www.SpartanMS.com.au

User avatar
Russellb
RIP Nov 2014
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:22 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Harden NSW
Contact:

Postby Russellb » Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:19 pm

Don't Worry Boags I wont Bite your Head Off
Was just in one of those mods That Day
\"Each to there own \"
My ClubmanRebuild
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE :)

User avatar
Sean
Racing Driver
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: NSW
Contact:

Postby Sean » Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:30 pm

Awesome results
When results speak for themselves - don't interrupt.

Casey
Racing Driver
Posts: 749
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Postby Casey » Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:51 pm

:shock: :!: Wow :!: :shock:

Impressive Russ, I might have to think a bit harder about that Autronic.

I take it this was the \"peak\" run. As an academic exercise, it would be interesting to do multiple power runs in a short period (ie with no cool down time between runs) to see the effect of not having an intercooler and compare this to when you do ultimately fit one. I know the conditions won't be the same, but it should still give a reasonable idea - and indicate if the first power run is stronger/weaker/the same without an intercooler.
White SP Image

User avatar
Sean
Racing Driver
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: NSW
Contact:

Re:

Postby Sean » Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:16 pm

Casey wrote::shock: :!: Wow :!: :shock:

Impressive Russ, I might have to think a bit harder about that Autronic.


WIthout trying to start an ECU war, the peak power has little to do with ECU brand, they can pretty much all supply the same fuel and timing figures for peak power if tuned correctly.

THe great benefit in Austronic is teh host of additional features you can select/benefit from.
When results speak for themselves - don't interrupt.

User avatar
timk
Racing Driver
Posts: 1928
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 3:16 pm
Vehicle: NC

Postby timk » Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:18 pm

Is that using my old turbo? Nice!

User avatar
Russellb
RIP Nov 2014
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:22 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Harden NSW
Contact:

Re:

Postby Russellb » Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:26 am

saboteur wrote:Is that using my old turbo? Nice!

NOPE Was a Rebuild and Highflowed T28 from Ebay
The one I got of you is in Bits and the Rebuild Kit is on it way

Casey I could do that It would just be time and Money. I'll just se what happens when I fit the IC
My ClubmanRebuild
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE :)

User avatar
Russellb
RIP Nov 2014
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:22 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Harden NSW
Contact:

Re:

Postby Russellb » Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:55 am

phatMX wrote:have you found boost coming on later with the T28? or any differences at all from the T25


The T28 starts to come on around 2500rpm and has uasable boost by 3000rpm
where the T25 came on at 1500rpm and had usable boost by 2200rpm
but the T25 was over at 5500 rpm
The T28 is easyer to drive with no Kick in the back. Just nice & smooth
My ClubmanRebuild
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE :)

The Pupat
Fast Driver
Posts: 350
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:21 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane

Re:

Postby The Pupat » Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:52 pm

Casey wrote::shock: :!: Wow :!: :shock:

Impressive Russ, I might have to think a bit harder about that Autronic.

I take it this was the "peak" run. As an academic exercise, it would be interesting to do multiple power runs in a short period (ie with no cool down time between runs) to see the effect of not having an intercooler and compare this to when you do ultimately fit one. I know the conditions won't be the same, but it should still give a reasonable idea - and indicate if the first power run is stronger/weaker/the same without an intercooler.


The need to intercool has little to do with heat soak. When you pressurise air you you increase the temperature of the air which means you decrease the density from what it could theoretically be if you were to just increase the pressure without increase the temperature. As such the heat soak from the turbo charger has little to do with the intake air temperature. You put the intercooler in to remove the heat from the intake air after it is pressurised to reclaim some of that lost density. The other one of course is that high intake temps can lead to detonation.
'92, Red, Hardtop, Noisy CAI, Even more Noisy Exhaust, AVO Shocks with TJR Springs (Not so Fuli drifto speco).


Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest