NB8 91 or 95 ron fuel?

Engines, Transmissions & Final Drive questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy

User avatar
miata
Speed Racer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: Sufferers Parasite
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby miata » Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:41 pm

NitroDann wrote:GP maybe some people think that the forum is a place for giving good correct information when you have it and reading good correct information when you dont. And telling people info you just pulled out of your ass because it sounds about right down at the pub is NOT what the forum is for.

If the info was regarding door trims who cares but not steering brakes or engines please, because thats just negligent.

Dann

Who died and made you Moderator? Please refrain from lowering the tone of this forum.
Moderator Qld.
Life Member MX-5 Club of N.S.W. #169
Waiter, I had the soup du jour yesterday and THIS ISN'T IT!

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11856
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

Re: NB8 question

Postby 93_Clubman » Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:41 pm

BadBong wrote:Back to a more technical question - why does NB8B require better fuel?

Does it have anything to do with VVT?

Higher compression:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=17082&p=200449

magenb
Fast Driver
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:17 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT

Re: NB8 question

Postby magenb » Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:50 pm

93_Clubman wrote:
magenb wrote:
93_Clubman wrote:According to Redbook 91 RON:
http://www.redbook.com.au/used-cars/det ... 1040CF8DDF


Redbook is a good guide. If you lookup 2000 and 2001 models, it says 91 ron, which Dale says is wrong :)

Indeed, RB is only a guide, & it's wrong for the NB8B, but it's not wrong for the NB8A.
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=36865&p=478938#p478938
viewtopic.php?f=29&t=35915&p=466405

The NB8A spanned 1998-2000 & the NB8B spanned 2000-2002.



Awesome info there.

On a side note, the first link has a compat guide for E10 which is from Caltex, suggesting Mx5s older than 2005 shouldn't use it. The BP site says just about everything will work lol http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?cat ... Id=7038421

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re: NB8 question

Postby JBT » Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:58 pm

magenb wrote:Was the Aus spec 99 model tuned from factory on 91 or 95 ron fuel?

Same as the NA i.e. ULP - 91 RON. The NB8B and NC use 95 RON. Only the NC is recommended by Mazda to use E10 (min 95 RON).

I'm not sure of the factory (handbook) minimum recommended RON for the SP or SE.
Image

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11856
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

Re: NB8 question

Postby 93_Clubman » Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:12 pm

magenb wrote:On a side note, the first link has a compat guide for E10 which is from Caltex, suggesting Mx5s older than 2005 shouldn't use it. The BP site says just about everything will work lol http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?cat ... Id=7038421

Here's Mazda's view:
http://www.mazda.com.au/Owners/Motoring ... Chart.aspx

User avatar
Boyracer
MX-5 Encyclopedia
Posts: 2568
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Silverdale.NSW
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby Boyracer » Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:15 pm

NB8B runs a higher compression ratio therefore they will recommend the higher octane fuel.

All the NB series engines run a knock sensor so even if you do run lower grade fuels the engine sould be safe... The only effects would be less performance and higher fuel consumption.
NC Roadie, NC Racey, ND Racey….and a 30AE

Plus several others in the bone yard...

User avatar
Old Dude
Racing Driver
Posts: 1166
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:06 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Gold Coast

Re: NB8 question

Postby Old Dude » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:01 pm

Interesting how manufacturers decide what is suitable fuel..........I have a 2008 X trail, that Nissan told me do not run it on E10, now you would think that such a relative new car it would be designed to run on E10 :? :shock:

Cheers
Dale 8)

Question for those in the know, is E10 a higher octane than 91? I was told it was because ethnol is higher octane. But I would really like to know for sure.
"Everybody dies......, but not everybody lives" ;-)

MX 5 2001 Grace Green
NB8B

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby NitroDann » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:03 pm

miata wrote:
NitroDann wrote:GP maybe some people think that the forum is a place for giving good correct information when you have it and reading good correct information when you dont. And telling people info you just pulled out of your ass because it sounds about right down at the pub is NOT what the forum is for.

If the info was regarding door trims who cares but not steering brakes or engines please, because thats just negligent.

Dann

Who died and made you Moderator? Please refrain from lowering the tone of this forum.


Everytime I post you show up, it used to be 1red5 before he looked stupid in Joshs thread.
If you indulge in giving wrong info like its real info great, but im going to call people out who make things up and post it like fact. :shock:

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby NitroDann » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:04 pm

BadBong wrote:Back to a more technical question - why does NB8B require better fuel?

Does it have anything to do with VVT?


It has to do with higher compression, higher compression improves combustion efficiency hence emissions (and power..).

Boyracer wrote:NB8B runs a higher compression ratio therefore they will recommend the higher octane fuel.

All the NB series engines run a knock sensor so even if you do run lower grade fuels the engine sould be safe... The only effects would be less performance and higher fuel consumption


Knock sensors only pull back timing after they sense knock. To prevent knock run better fuel/less timing. Just because it wont do it non stop doesnt mean its a good thing and the ecu wont learn to pull timing every time a hill approaches.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
miata
Speed Racer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: Sufferers Parasite
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby miata » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:06 pm

NitroDann wrote:
miata wrote:
NitroDann wrote:GP maybe some people think that the forum is a place for giving good correct information when you have it and reading good correct information when you dont. And telling people info you just pulled out of your ass because it sounds about right down at the pub is NOT what the forum is for.

If the info was regarding door trims who cares but not steering brakes or engines please, because thats just negligent.

Dann

Who died and made you Moderator? Please refrain from lowering the tone of this forum.


Everytime I post you show up, it used to be 1red5 before he looked stupid in Joshs thread.
If you indulge in giving wrong info like its real info great, but im going to call people out who make things up and post it like fact. :shock:

Dann

If that was aimed at me, I might remind you, that I AM the moderator, you are not. It's not up to you to tell people what they can or cannot post. You are annoying people and we don't like that here.
Moderator Qld.
Life Member MX-5 Club of N.S.W. #169
Waiter, I had the soup du jour yesterday and THIS ISN'T IT!

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby NitroDann » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:09 pm

Old Dude wrote:Interesting how manufacturers decide what is suitable fuel..........I have a 2008 X trail, that Nissan told me do not run it on E10, now you would think that such a relative new car it would be designed to run on E10 :? :shock:

Cheers
Dale 8)

Question for those in the know, is E10 a higher octane than 91? I was told it was because ethnol is higher octane. But I would really like to know for sure.


E10 is a slightly complicated thing here. And for the record I ran my car on E10 (tuned for it...by me) and now run E85 (Only oz mx5 i think, also tuned by me, going for 6 months strong now).

It cant be 'designed' to run on e10 and 'designed' to run on regular petrol also. (I know I know, flex fuel sensors... but thats getting too far into it for this question I think)

Ethanol has a different stoichiometric ratio than petrol, and Its knock resistance is much higher.
If the car is tuned for petrol then it will be both too lean to be optimised for E10 AND will be running too retarded.

Obviously E85 has so much ethanol your car simply wont run on it without a full retune where as e10 is close enough that it will run not perfect, but good enough most people wont notice.

theres nothing wrong with E10. It is USUALLY 95 octane (ethanol is 115 octane or close to it so adding it will increase octane) but many manufacturers ddont take 91 and add 10% ethanol improving the octane, instead take 87 and add the e10 to get it back to 91. United is all 95 Octane for the record.

E85 is 105-110 octane depending on the exact percentage of ethanol in use (eg united is 90% and winter blend of caltex like right now is just 70%, with it hitting 85% at caltex in summer).

I hope this answers your question.

Dann
Last edited by NitroDann on Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby NitroDann » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:10 pm

Miata you dont like it and either does 1red5. But my 200 strong inbox disagrees that everyone dislikes it.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
miata
Speed Racer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: Sufferers Parasite
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby miata » Thu Jul 07, 2011 4:29 pm

NitroDann wrote:Miata you dont like it and either does 1red5. But my 200 strong inbox disagrees that everyone dislikes it.

Dann

I'm not going to argue with you, neither did I mention "everybody", I said that you are annoying people.
Cease being confrontational.
Moderator Qld.
Life Member MX-5 Club of N.S.W. #169
Waiter, I had the soup du jour yesterday and THIS ISN'T IT!

User avatar
Old Dude
Racing Driver
Posts: 1166
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:06 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Gold Coast

Re: NB8 question

Postby Old Dude » Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:23 pm

Thanks Dann that makes sence,
Cheers
Dale 8)
"Everybody dies......, but not everybody lives" ;-)

MX 5 2001 Grace Green
NB8B

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: NB8 question

Postby NitroDann » Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:30 pm

Any time. 8)

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.


Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 152 guests