GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Anything to do with the MX5 and Motor Sport

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
Rotary
Fast Driver
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:03 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Sydney

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Rotary » Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:07 pm

Has anyone using GPS LAP timers, had issues with the data accuracy? by that I mean, drawing out lines traveled that sit well away from the track resulting in G’s ,speed etc. being off

I’m using the QStarz Q818X with Racechrono and guessing its most likely the Qstarz GPS unit becoming faulty, but apparently GPS satellites can at times suffer from ionospheric interference or issues from solar flares,
but I have no idea how this interference may affect readings if at all

I’ve used this setup for about 6 months now on 3 separate occasions at EC with no errors or distorted data in any sessions.

On Monday at Wakefield, 7 out of the 11 sessions were distorted even when rotated between 3 different cars,

It went from working fine in the 1st session to slightly off in the next 3, then 2 fairly distorted readings followed by 2 that were severely distorted,
then magically it worked perfectly for 3 in a row


Good

Image


Slightly off

Image


Fairly distorted

Image


Severely distorted

Image

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Guran » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:30 am

Woh! That's weird! My PerformanceBox worked fine for the entire day on Monday. I'll post some circuit maps tonight. Have you checked the number of satellites your GPS was picking up? Looks to me like there might be a problem with the sensor? Might also be worth posting this on the Racechrono forum if you haven't already.
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

User avatar
Rotary
Fast Driver
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:03 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Sydney

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Rotary » Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:28 pm

Good to know yours worked fine (same place same time).

The sat number was between 7-11 all day, I can't see a pattern related to it as it worked fine on 7 or 10 and some sessions that had errors where also fixed to 10.

How many sats did yours fix to?

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby JBT » Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:52 pm

Some possible causes of your GPS errors:

Multipath effects
Interference (natural or artificial)
Small angular separation of satellites
Satellites too low to the horizon
Image

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7707
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby bruce » Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:15 pm

JBT wrote:Some possible causes of your GPS errors:

Multipath effects
Interference (natural or artificial)
Small angular separation of satellites
Satellites too low to the horizon


Drinking and driving... :lol:

User avatar
Rotary
Fast Driver
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:03 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Sydney

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Rotary » Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:03 pm

JBT wrote:Some possible causes of your GPS errors:

Multipath effects
Interference (natural or artificial)
Small angular separation of satellites
Satellites too low to the horizon



I’m wondering if these sorts of interference are the cause, and either the GPS unit or the software is unable to decipher between good sat data and bad sat data(sats having Interference issues), whereas the Performance Box may deal with it better.

It has worked fine previously so most likely only a fault in my GPS unit, but will be interesting if others using a similar setup have come across it.

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Guran » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:45 pm

I just had a closer look at my PerformanceBox data. There was one brief period where the position data was off quite a bit, but nothing as bad as yours was. I was only getting 4 satellites during the warm-up lap of my 3rd session and the position was way out but then came good for the timed laps (see attached map).

session3s.jpg


Here's a summary of the number of satellites I got throughout the day:

1 - 8 satellites
2 - 8 satellites
3 - started with 4 then latched onto 6-8 satellites (mostly 8 )
4 - 6-8 satellites (mostly 8 )
5 - 5-7 satellites
6 - 8 satellites

It doesn't seem to latch on to any more than 8 satellites. Unfortunately my fastest lap was the first one in the 5th session, which explains why my GPS timing was a few tenths off the official time.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby manga_blue » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:44 am

35 lap session at Winton last weekend using a Nokia E51 and Qstarz BT818EXtreme. I only looked once or twice during the day, to notice that there were 8 satellites.
Winton 6hr 2009.jpg

They're all spot on this time but on some tracks on some days the whole lot can be displaced by 10 or 15 meters. I've never experienced the sort of variation you got on a single day. Also, actual times were all within 0.1 sec of official times.
The fat bits indicate the overtaking zones 8) , except for the main straight which is the being overtaken zone :oops: .

I suspect your Qstarz is a bit suss.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
’95 NA8

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby JBT » Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:21 am

It doesn't matter if you have 8 or 18 satellites. If the angles are all wrong and there is some interference about, you will get some inaccurate information. It will vary from day to day and even during the day.
Image

User avatar
Caffeine
Racing Driver
Posts: 1806
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Sydney

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Caffeine » Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:38 pm

GPS units will also report a parameter called 'HDOP' (horizontal dilution of precision) which is an indication of how good or not the fix actually is...

It's in the GPGGA NMEA sentence, what your logger does with that information I have no idea.
Image
Supreme Blue NB8B, 1:16.98 at Wakefield when stock, but it's not stock any more...

User avatar
Rotary
Fast Driver
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:03 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Sydney

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Rotary » Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:06 pm

JBT wrote:It doesn't matter if you have 8 or 18 satellites. If the angles are all wrong and there is some interference about, you will get some inaccurate information. It will vary from day to day and even during the day.



I think we may have solved it and may be related to what your saying JBT.

As a sat moves on its own orbit the signal travells a longer path through the earths ionosphere, this creates dispersion effects similar to the change in colours seen in the sun at different angles, so the signal suffers a slight distortion,
As it flies further away the path through the Ionosphere gradually increases with a similar increase in the distortion.

So essentially if the unit remains fixed to a sat moving out of range, then the data will slowly begin to distort, as seen in the pattern of increased distortion over time in the track data, until the Sat was dropped and it all went back to normal.

The reason it may have remained fixed to a sat. With a 35hr battery life I left it on all day :roll:

Sound about right?

User avatar
broady
Racing Driver
Posts: 1243
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:32 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Sydney NSW

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby broady » Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:12 pm

I'm not sure if it's true, but I heard that the civilian GPS doesn't give anywhere near as accurate as a reading as is actually possible (i.e. false data put in to stop terrorists doing ... things??)

edit: On upon a time...

Initially the highest quality signal was reserved for military use, and the signal available for civilian use intentionally degraded ("Selective Availability", SA). Selective Availability was ended in 2000, improving the precision of civilian GPS from about 100m to about 20m.
Image
人馬一体 NA8
Tein SS, Torsen T2, BD, Maxim Works→RS*R, ARC, Koyo, SSR, Sparco, Flyin' Miata & bling!

6/5/2010

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby JBT » Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:48 pm

Rotary wrote:As a sat moves on its own orbit the signal travells a longer path through the earths ionosphere, this creates dispersion effects similar to the change in colours seen in the sun at different angles, so the signal suffers a slight distortion,
As it flies further away the path through the Ionosphere gradually increases with a similar increase in the distortion.

So essentially if the unit remains fixed to a sat moving out of range, then the data will slowly begin to distort, as seen in the pattern of increased distortion over time in the track data, until the Sat was dropped and it all went back to normal.

The reason it may have remained fixed to a sat. With a 35hr battery life I left it on all day :roll:

Sound about right?

Ionospheric effects are one source of error, but it's usually averaged out by the receiver. It was more likely a combination of some or all of GDOP (geometric dilution of position), multipath effects and interference. It doesn't take much to throw it out by 10 or so metres - which is still very accurate for a relatively cheap receiver.
Image

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby Guran » Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:35 pm

JBT wrote:It doesn't take much to throw it out by 10 or so metres - which is still very accurate for a relatively cheap receiver.

Rotary's worst logs are displaced by almost 150m!
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

GPS LAP TIMERS (Distorted Results)

Postby JBT » Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:28 pm

150m is quite possible too.
Image


Return to “MX5 Motor Sport”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests