Engine Size
Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel
-
- Learner Driver
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 11:27 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Melbourne
Engine Size
Which is better a 16l or 18l engine?
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: Engine Size
They're both a B series Mazda engine, one just has 200cc more.
This is really like asking "what's better, this apple, or this slightly larger apple?"
The 1.8 has more power stock.
This is really like asking "what's better, this apple, or this slightly larger apple?"
The 1.8 has more power stock.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
- Jeo
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:33 am
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Canberra
Re: Engine Size
16L would be pretty good I'd have thought, but 18L seems even better.
- greenMachine
- Forum Guru
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Sports car paradise - Canberra
- Contact:
Re: Engine Size
The extra weight makes the understeer worse, but I guess you could just change the PS pulley if it's too bad ...Jeo wrote:16L would be pretty good I'd have thought, but 18L seems even better.

I never met a horsepower I didn't like (thanks bwob)
Build thread
NB SE - gone to the dark side (and loving it
)
Build thread
NB SE - gone to the dark side (and loving it

-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 11980
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Engine Size
sticks10 wrote:Which is better a 16l or 18l engine?
Depends what you prefer - best to have a drive of a 1.6 MX5 as well as a 1.8 MX5.
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 5:08 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
Re: Engine Size
1.6L is absolutely much more fun, more revier (if thats a word). Has good power if you have a/c delete and PS delete.
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
-
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:30 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Engine Size
The 1.6 is more competitive in a 1.6 liter motor sport category than the 1.8 is in a 2.0L category.
WP:1.12.492 SMPN:1.16.403 SMPS:1.05.473 SMPGP:1.53.256 SMPB:2.22.181
-
- Learner Driver
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 11:27 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Engine Size
Thanks for the heads up,Guy's. I guess the 16 was a little more sportier. 

- smy0003
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:35 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Engine Size
I've dríven a 1.6 as well as my two 1.8 cars.
Didn't notice much difference, I felt that the 1.6 was a touch easier to ring out but I put that down to the shorter diff.
The 1.6 does sound the nicest to my ears, though.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Didn't notice much difference, I felt that the 1.6 was a touch easier to ring out but I put that down to the shorter diff.
The 1.6 does sound the nicest to my ears, though.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
[b]Then: Sunlight Silver NB8B
Now: Chaste White NA8
Now: Chaste White NA8
- Jeo
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3655
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:33 am
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Canberra
Re: Engine Size
Unless you're specifically going for a 1600 class, you're kidding yourself if you think the 1.6 is a better engine in any measurable way.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests